All agenda items

The Centre Party proposes that Stockholm inventory the city's avenues and older trees, develop a strategy for their care and development, and identify new areas for tree planting, including transforming Karlbergsvägen into a green esplanade. The city responds that it is already working on a new tree policy addressing many of these issues, such as increasing canopy cover and inventorying trees. However, completely redesigning Karlbergsvägen is limited by underground infrastructure, though replanting efforts are underway.

Jan Jönsson (L) proposed that the City of Stockholm map the prevalence of homophobia and transphobia within its own operations to better understand and combat discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals, with results informing future measures and annual follow-up. While most committees and administrations believe their existing human rights program and new LGBTQI+ action plan sufficiently address this and a separate mapping is unnecessary or difficult, Jönsson argues current efforts are insufficient, lack focus on residents' experiences, and advocates for more LGBTQ-certified operations.

Council members Jan Jönsson and Anne-Lie Elfvén (both L) proposed measures to reduce bureaucracy, speed up permit processes, and clarify rules for Stockholm's visitor industry, arguing its importance for the city's appeal and economy. The City Executive Board, led by Karin Wanngård, rejected the motion, stating the city already actively addresses these issues through existing initiatives, digitalization, and a functioning industry council. However, Jan Jönsson (L) registered a reservation, noting industry support for the motion highlights the need for further action.

Jonas Naddebo (Centre Party) proposed that the City Executive Board take coordinated responsibility for making Fagersjöviken in Magelungen more attractive for water recreation, citing its deterioration and lack of clear plans for improvement. The Board, however, recommended rejecting the motion, stating that the city already undertakes extensive and coordinated efforts to improve both water quality and recreational opportunities throughout Magelungen, including Fagersjöviken, and that no further directive is needed, while emphasizing the lake's ecological balance. Naddebo was not satisfied and dissented, arguing for more specific interventions in Fagersjöviken and the need for external funding.

Two Liberal politicians proposed evaluating Stockholm's environmental zones, particularly in Gamla stan and Södermalm, for their impact on air quality, emissions, residents, and businesses, and comparing them with measures in other cities. The City Executive Board responded that ongoing evaluations already show positive effects on air quality, though compliance needs improvement, and they plan to introduce a stricter environmental zone in the City area.

The Liberals propose an investigation into digital tools in Stockholm's preschools, aiming for clear guidelines and screen-free environments, except for older children with a pedagogical purpose, citing concerns about screen time's negative impact on development. The city responds that the new preschool curriculum, effective July 1, 2025, already removes digital tool requirements, emphasizes analog learning for younger children, and that the Swedish National Agency for Education is developing support materials. Therefore, the city leadership believes the motion's intentions are met and preschool teachers should retain professional discretion over learning tools.

The Liberals propose that the City of Stockholm map honor-based oppression in preschools to better implement measures and educate staff, citing a lack of knowledge about the problem's extent and unclear current guidelines. The municipal board's majority rejects an immediate mapping, preferring to await a government inquiry on honor-related violence in preschools and schools, due in 2026, though work against honor-based oppression will continue in the interim.

Destiny Zandi Lindgren (KD) proposed that Stockholm should aim to maintain at least the same number of parking spaces as in 2020, to support motorists and ensure parking availability keeps pace with city growth. However, several boards and companies, including the Traffic Committee, argued that this contradicts the city's current plan to reduce car traffic by 30% by 2030, improve accessibility, reduce climate impact, and create more appealing public spaces, noting the city already has strategic parking plans and new guidelines in place.

Johan Nilsson (M) motioned for the City of Stockholm to acquire or exchange land to preserve Långbro Park, as a private owner plans to build 12 townhouses and a café on a historically park-integrated property. The City Executive Board, however, believes the detailed planning for the townhouses should proceed and public consultation be held before any decision. While relevant committees deemed the development feasible and Stadshus AB supported housing, they noted that land acquisition was outside their current scope.

Jonas Naddebo (Centre Party) proposes transforming Johanneshovsvägen into a green boulevard with reduced speed limits and fewer lanes. This would free up space for approximately 1045 new homes, wider pedestrian and bicycle paths, and a new square at Lindes light rail station, aiming to create a greener and more vibrant area. The Centre Party's proposal aligns with the city's existing plans for Årstastråket but seeks a more extensive urban development than currently planned.

The Liberals propose changes to Stockholm's land allocation policy, aiming for clearer social requirements when assigning land to developers to build more affordable homes. They also want the Social Welfare Committee to play a larger role in housing for special needs groups. However, the City Executive Board believes current work on new land allocation guidelines and a housing supply action plan already addresses these intentions, and that social considerations are already factored into housing construction.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposes developing Kista into a Nordic total defense center to reverse the negative trend of businesses leaving and to increase safety, urging the city to collaborate with the government and others to attract defense-related operations. The City Executive Board responds that the city is already working intensely to develop Kista into a more vibrant and attractive mixed-use area focused on technology and innovation, with defense-related areas already part of the strategy, deeming the motion addressed by ongoing work.

Gabriel Kroon (SD) proposed that Stockholm residents should be able to pay to have a tree planted on public land, contributing to urban greenery without burdening the budget. However, the City Executive Board advises against this, citing past similar initiatives as administratively demanding with issues concerning tree selection and maintenance. The city is instead investing 71 million SEK in tree planting and care, and is developing a new tree policy.

Two SD politicians proposed that all signs and advertisements in Stockholm should primarily be in Swedish, with Swedish text being twice as large and legible as any other language. However, the motion was rejected as most committees and politicians believe the city already complies with language laws and recognizes the need for multilingualism for tourists and new arrivals.

Liberal Party members propose that the city's policy documents, such as the architecture policy and the strategy for small-house areas, should have a greater impact on urban development, arguing that boards don't always follow them, which risks eroding Stockholm's unique character. The City Executive Board responds that the city is already working to strengthen the integration of these governing documents through follow-ups and training, concluding that the motion's intentions are largely met by ongoing efforts.

Åsa Nilsson Söderström (L) proposed that Stockholm establish a competence center against transnational oppression, aimed at individuals who have sought protection in Sweden but face threats and pressure from their home countries. While the center would gather knowledge, provide support, and offer legal aid, the majority of administrations and the City Commissioner believe this falls outside municipal responsibility and is a state affair. However, the Liberals argue it could be organized similarly to the Origo center for honor-related violence.

Jan Jönsson (L) proposed that Stockholm schools should more widely adopt "phonics" to improve students' reading ability, following an international study showing a decline. The majority of the City Executive Board and referral bodies, including Stockholm University, agreed that phonics is an important method but emphasized it's insufficient on its own. They advocate for a balanced approach incorporating multiple methods and focusing on language comprehension, especially for non-native Swedish speakers, and believe politicians should not micromanage teaching methods.

Jan Jönsson and Sara Svanström (L) proposed consolidating all Stockholm parking garages under Stockholm Parkering to improve efficiency and clarify responsibilities. While many stakeholders supported efficiency, they cited significant challenges, including legal and economic hurdles, with transferring ownership. It was instead suggested that Stockholm Parkering manage the parking areas through long-term agreements, with ownership remaining with current companies or boards, to avoid negative financial impacts on households.

Councillor Dennis Wedin (M) proposed measures to lower food prices by increasing competition among grocery stores, suggesting the city analyze competition in urban development, introduce a fast-track for new stores, and review existing zoning plans. However, the City Executive Board stated that the city already actively supports more grocery stores through initiatives like "New Grocery Stores – Proactive Planning and Land Allocation," deeming a fast-track unnecessary due to the importance of the zoning process for quality assurance, and a full review of all zoning plans not a priority, a decision that even the Moderates opposed, believing more action is needed.

Svante Linusson (C) proposed moving Stockholm's winter break to an earlier week, such as week 6, to increase the likelihood of snow and winter activities for children staying in the city, given that warmer Februarys often lead to a lack of snow during the current week 9 break. However, the city advises against this, stating that snow in week 6 is uncertain and such a change would cause significant disruption for schools, parents, and businesses that plan around the established break.