All agenda items

Jan Jönsson (L) proposed that the City of Stockholm map the prevalence of homophobia and transphobia within its operations to understand the problem's extent and develop concrete anti-discrimination measures for LGBTQI+ individuals. While several committees supported the work's importance, they believed existing human rights programs and an LGBTQI+ action plan already address the issue, arguing a separate mapping would be difficult and current reporting systems suffice. Jönsson and others, however, emphasized the need for a specific mapping focused on citizens' experiences with city services and a more proactive approach.

The motion proposes measures to simplify and improve conditions for Stockholm's visitor industry, including faster permit processing, better phone service, and a review of regulations for outdoor dining and dancing. However, the City Executive Board suggests responding to the motion by stating that the city is already addressing these issues through ongoing assignments and collaborations with the business sector, thus deeming further measures unnecessary.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposed that the City Executive Board assume coordinated responsibility for developing Fagersjöviken in Magelungen into an attractive area for water recreation, such as swimming, paddling, and fishing, citing its deterioration due to overgrowth and unclear responsibilities. The City Executive Board responded that the city is already working collaboratively to improve water quality, biodiversity, and recreational opportunities in Magelungen, with Fagersjöviken being prioritized within the "Focus Farsta" initiative.

Two Liberal politicians propose that the City of Stockholm evaluate its environmental zones, including those in Gamla stan and Södermalm, to understand their impact on air quality, emissions, residents, and businesses. While older zones have been evaluated, the city plans a broader assessment of the new environmental zone class 3, encompassing effects on residents and businesses, to ensure the zones are beneficial and proportionate to any problems they might create.

The Liberals (Jan Jönsson and Åsa Nilsson Söderström) proposed that the City of Stockholm investigate digital tool usage in preschools, establish clear guidelines, promote screen-free environments (except for older children with a pedagogical purpose), and support play and physical activity, citing negative impacts of excessive screen time. The city responded that the preschool curriculum, revised July 1, 2025, already emphasizes analog tools, especially for children under two, and mandates restrictive use of digital tools for clear pedagogical purposes. The City Executive Office and district committees believe the curriculum changes and ongoing support material from the National Agency for Education cover the motion's intent, advocating for preschool teachers' freedom in tool selection, with some districts having already conducted local surveys and updated guidelines.

The Liberals propose that the City of Stockholm map honor-based oppression in preschools to better implement measures and educate staff, citing a current lack of understanding regarding the problem's extent and clear guidelines for staff. The City Executive Board responds that the city is already addressing the issue and a national inquiry is underway, suggesting its results should be awaited before a local mapping is conducted, even as work against honor-based oppression continues.

Destiny Zandi Lindgren (KD) proposed that Stockholm aim to maintain parking levels at or above 2020 figures, arguing that parking facilitates daily life for many residents and contributes to a safer, more pleasant, and greener city. However, the City Executive Board and several committees rejected the motion, stating it conflicts with the city's goals to reduce car traffic by 30% by 2030, improve accessibility, and create more attractive public spaces.

A motion from Johan Nilsson (M) proposes Stockholm acquire land, possibly by exchange, to preserve the natural and cultural values of Långbro Park, specifically the Lågbron 1 property where a private owner plans twelve townhouses and a café. The motion suggests the city acquire the land to maintain the park's public character, potentially offering the owner an alternative nearby site for the housing. The City Executive Board proposes responding to the motion by referring to ongoing detailed development planning, as the Building Committee and the public have not yet received all viewpoints on the construction project.

Jonas Naddebo (Centre Party) proposes transforming Johanneshovsvägen into a green boulevard with fewer car lanes, making space for pedestrian and bicycle paths, greenery, shops, and restaurants, along with building approximately 1045 new homes, including student housing, and a new square at Lindes light rail station. The city notes that most of these proposals are already part of ongoing projects like "Årstastråket," but the Centre Party believes their motion goes further and should also encompass the stretch between Bolidenplan and Gullmarsplan.

The Liberals propose reviewing Stockholm's land allocation policy to impose clearer social demands on developers, aiming for more affordable housing and greater involvement from the social welfare committee to address needs of vulnerable groups. However, the City Executive Office, the Land and Exploitation Committee, and Stockholm City Hall AB believe current work and the new housing supply action plan already fulfill these intentions, deeming a policy revision unnecessary.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposes developing Kista into the Nordic total defense center to reverse the negative trend of businesses leaving and high vacancy rates. This involves urban development, new housing, and attracting defense-related operations and companies to Kista to create security, vitality, and jobs. The city responds that they are already actively strengthening Kista as an innovation district with a focus on defense and cybersecurity, but see no need for a new mandate or for Kista to become solely a defense center.

Gabriel Kroon (SD) proposed allowing residents to "buy" trees planted on public land, complete with a name plaque, to fund green initiatives and increase urban greenery. However, the majority of committees advised against the proposal due to high administrative costs, legal ownership issues, and the risk of trees dying. Instead, the municipality is investing 71 million SEK in tree planting and maintenance by 2026 and developing a new tree policy.

Two SD politicians proposed that all public signs in Stockholm should primarily be in Swedish, meaning Swedish text must be at least twice the size of any other language. However, the City Executive Board and several district committees rejected the proposal, citing concerns about it violating the constitution and the need for multilingualism in an international city like Stockholm, while also noting the city's own communication already prioritizes Swedish.

Two Liberal politicians, Björn Ljung and André Nilsson, propose that the city's various policy documents, such as those for architecture and small house areas, should be better adhered to in urban development, advocating for clearer coordination between committees and regular follow-up. The City Executive Board responded that the city already works extensively with this through training and follow-ups to ensure guidelines are met, but the Liberals believe this is insufficient, particularly concerning the protection of villa areas.

Åsa Nilsson Söderström (L) proposed Stockholm establish a competence center to assist residents experiencing transnational repression from their home country's regimes, offering knowledge, support, and legal aid. The City Executive Board and district councils rejected the motion, deeming it a national matter, but the Liberal party argued it's akin to the city's existing Origo center against honor-related violence, making it a suitable municipal responsibility.

Liberal party member Jan Jönsson proposed Stockholm schools increase their use of "phonics" to improve students' reading skills, citing an international study on declining literacy. The majority in the municipal executive board and education committee agree phonics is important but not the sole method, advocating for a balanced approach with multiple techniques to ensure all students, especially those with other native languages, develop strong reading comprehension. They also voiced concerns about politicians micromanaging teachers' methodological choices.

Liberal politicians proposed consolidating all city-owned parking garages under one company, Stockholm Parkering, to streamline management. However, the City Executive Board rejected this, stating that current long-term leases already achieve the motion's goal and that transferring ownership would be legally and economically complex; the Liberals and Moderates dissented, arguing for an investigation.

Councillor Dennis Wedin (M) proposed that the city should work to lower food prices by facilitating the establishment of more grocery stores, thereby increasing competition. This included competition analyses in new urban planning, fast-tracking building permits for food stores, and reviewing existing plans in the city center. The City of Stockholm rejected the motion, stating they already actively promote new grocery stores, partly through the "New Food Stores – Proactive Planning and Land Allocation" project. They believe existing processes are sufficient for quality assurance and a fast-track is unnecessary, also arguing that more liberal legislation could increase car traffic and weaken local city centers.

The motion proposed moving the sports break to an earlier week to increase the likelihood of snow and winter activities for schoolchildren, especially those remaining in Stockholm, due to increasingly warm and snowless Februarys during week 9. However, the City Executive Board and Education Committee advised against this, citing the lack of snow guarantee in week 6, the established and convenient timing of week 9 for families, and the potential logistical and economic challenges an alteration would create for schools, businesses, and organizations.

Two politicians from the Sweden Democrats aim to halt the construction of an LSS residential home in Lammholmen, citing concerns over unsuitable ground conditions, potential damage to an old-growth forest, and highway noise. The City of Stockholm responds by emphasizing the significant need for LSS housing and assuring that all issues regarding ground, noise, and natural values will be thoroughly investigated during the democratic and transparent planning process, affirming its commitment to the project to meet the demand for adapted housing.