City-wide

Council members Jan Jönsson and Sara Svanström (L) propose that the city invest more in improving accessibility and navigability in the urban environment for all residents, particularly those with disabilities, citing issues like building waste bags on sidewalks and inadequate snow removal. The City Executive Board suggests responding that the city is already addressing these concerns through initiatives like a pilot project against building waste bags and improved snow removal, though current legislation limits further action.

Mikael Valier Furtenbach (KD) proposed that Stockholm introduce special architectural zones in the city center and older districts to regulate the height, volume, materials, and design of new buildings for better harmony with existing older structures. The City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion, asserting that current steering documents and legislation already suffice to protect the city's character and cultural environment, and that the city must be able to develop with consideration for architecture from all periods.

Kristin Jacobsson (C) proposed that Stockholm should adhere to the Council of Europe's anti-trafficking convention, which grants potential victims at least 30 days' reflection period with a residence permit and a package of rights. The motion highlighted the low number of applications from social welfare committees despite widespread exploitation of women in prostitution. The City Executive Board suggests responding to the motion by stating that the city is already actively addressing these issues and that its program against violence and human trafficking is being revised to include the matter.

Council members Jan Jönsson and Anne-Lie Elfvén (L) proposed that Stockholm City investigate the living conditions and health of elderly LGBTQI+ individuals in elder care, also calling for LGBTQI+ competence requirements in elder care procurements and continuous staff training on respectful treatment, equal opportunities, and LGBTQI+ issues. However, the City Executive Board suggests that the motion be addressed by referring to ongoing work on the city's action plan for LGBTQI+ persons' equal rights and opportunities.

Councilors Ismail Ali and Claes Nyberg (C) proposed that the Preschool Committee develop a plan for all preschools in Stockholm to conduct cultivation as part of their pedagogical activities, aiming to strengthen children's understanding of nature and sustainable development. The City Executive Board suggests that the motion be answered by referring to current municipal efforts and steering documents, such as new play value guidelines and the Sustainable Preschool project, which already promote cultivation and green environments in preschools, deeming further city-wide direction unnecessary.

Claes Nyberg (C) proposed that Stockholm City introduce sibling priority for preschool placements where an older sibling attends a primary school organizationally or geographically linked to the preschool, aiming to ease family life and promote equality. The City Executive Board recommends rejecting the motion, citing that the proposal requires extensive investigations, is not justified given existing school choice, and that such organizational links are currently absent.

Rasmus Jonlund et al. from the Liberal Party proposed a motion for the city to begin planning a Stockholm Exhibition in 2030, seeking collaborations for its realization. This exhibition would mark the centenary of the 1930 Stockholm Exhibition, focusing on future architecture, design, and urban planning. As the City Executive Office and Stockholm Business Region AB are already investigating the prerequisites for such an exhibition, the Municipal Board suggests responding to the motion by referring to this ongoing work.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposed that the municipality investigate merging its three housing companies, Familjebostäder, Svenska Bostäder, and Stockholmshem, to improve cost, climate, and energy efficiency and increase housing availability. However, the City Executive Board recommends dismissing the motion without an investigation, believing the companies are already addressing these areas and that a merger could complicate governance and leadership, as well as raise competition law issues.

Jonas Naddebo (C) has proposed an "athletic standard" for Stockholm, meaning the city would plan and allocate land for sports facilities early in new urban development projects like Frihamnen and Slakthusområdet. The motion also advocates for greater private sector involvement in planning these spaces to prevent sports from being deprioritized, addressing the urgent shortage of sports facilities identified by sports federations.

Hanna Wistrand (L) has proposed that Stockholm city investigate offering swimming lessons for newly arrived adults, collaborating with Swedish for Immigrants (SFI) and local sports clubs, aiming to improve swimming skills and integration. The City Executive Board suggests responding to the motion, partly by noting ongoing efforts to increase swimming proficiency among newly arrived individuals and national inquiries into including swimming information in civic orientation programs.

Nike Örbrink (KD) proposed that Stockholm introduce more care animals in municipal care homes to meet the emotional needs of the elderly, especially those with cognitive impairment, through physical touch and animal contact. While the City Executive Office and the Elderly Care Committee acknowledge the positive impact of care animals, they also highlighted challenges related to trained animals and guidelines for hygiene and allergies. The City Council therefore suggests that the motion be answered by referring to ongoing efforts and existing challenges.

The Centre Party proposed that the City of Stockholm and Region Stockholm implement a joint routine to ensure all preschool children with autism receive equivalent, coordinated, and early behavioral interventions, as recommended by the National Board of Health and Welfare. However, the City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion, citing ongoing work and existing cooperation agreements, though the Moderates, Liberals, and Centre Party filed reservations, arguing current routines are insufficient to guarantee equity.

City Council member Nike Örbrink (KD) proposed allowing seniors to bring and consume their own alcoholic beverages, like wine or beer, at Stockholm's open community centers, such as Lusthuset Hornstull, to enhance their daily lives and treat them as adults. However, the City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion, noting that the Alcohol Act primarily governs this, and such a change could hinder the sale of non-alcoholic beverages like coffee, which are crucial for the centers' social activities. Several committees and City Commissioner Torun Boucher also believe revising local regulations would be ineffective, as existing law already permits some alcohol consumption in special housing under limited hours.

The Liberals proposed that Stockholm city should raise its ambitions for electrification as a central part of climate work, investigate how to accelerate electrification with concrete measures, and allocate funds for this. The City Executive Board suggests responding to the motion by referring to the city's existing Climate Action Plan 2030, which already includes many measures for electrification and reduced traffic emissions. However, the Liberals argue that the plan is insufficient and demand faster action, particularly for charging infrastructure in outer city districts and a more equitable transition.

Council members Sara Svanström and Elin Hjelmestam (both Liberals) propose that the City of Stockholm investigate and introduce differentiated parking fees, meaning higher charges for fossil-fueled vehicles to reduce emissions and improve air quality. The City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion, citing that current legislation does not permit such fees and a change in law would be required.

Jan Jönsson and Christina Tufvesson (L) propose in a motion that the City of Stockholm investigate how to create more affordable and accessible premises for associations and local entrepreneurs, especially in the outer city, as such spaces are vital for a vibrant urban life. The City Executive Board suggests responding to the motion by referencing existing work, as they believe the city is already addressing these issues through various initiatives and collaborative efforts.

A motion by Jonas Naddebo (C), Dennis Wedin (C/M), and Nike Örbrink (KD) proposed that sports clubs should retain subsidized rent for events even if they serve light beer, to support their finances and activities. The City Executive Office and the Sports Committee note that the Sports Committee has already decided to adjust the fees for 2026 to allow this, meaning the motion's request has already been met.

Liberal Party members propose Stockholm city develop its strategy for single-family home areas, emphasizing how new buildings' design fits into existing character and giving green spaces greater importance in projects. The City Executive Board suggests responding by noting that the City Planning Committee is already reviewing relevant guidelines, especially in light of upcoming changes to the Planning and Building Act.

Council members Jan Jönsson and Christina Tufvesson (both L) propose the city develop an action plan to reduce SFI (Swedish for Immigrants) dropouts, citing numerous dropouts and the need for a comprehensive plan to improve integration and labor market establishment. However, the City Executive Office and the Labor Market Committee believe existing efforts already address this systematically, rendering a new plan unnecessary. While the Enskede-Årsta-Vantör district committee supports an action plan, the Hässelby-Vällingby and Kungsholmen district committees do not see the need for a separate one.

The Centre Party proposed investigating the adaptation of Stockholm Stads Parkerings AB's parking garages into sheltered spaces, equipped with water, sanitation, and ventilation for use during crises or war. The City Executive Board recommends awaiting national requirements and state funding, while the Centre Party advocates for more proactive city action.