City-wide

Jan Jönsson (L) has proposed a motion to amend the collaboration agreement between Skolfastigheter i Stockholm AB (SISAB) and the Education Committee. The aim is for the cost of replacing entry systems in schools and preschools to become a property owner's responsibility, rather than burdening the schools' and preschools' budgets. This would ensure a basic safety standard and a good working environment for all schools, regardless of their financial situation.

Councillor Jan Jönsson (L) proposed that the City of Stockholm inventory all schoolyards and carry out necessary upgrades to make them accessible to everyone, including children and young people with disabilities, citing a report that highlighted exclusion due to inaccessible school environments. However, the City Executive Board suggests that the City Council reject the motion, referring to the city's existing accessibility efforts, as committees and companies are already addressing the issue within current policy documents and ongoing projects.

Jan Jönsson (L) has proposed that Stockholm place vocational programs in popular inner-city high schools with theoretical profiles, develop a strategy to increase the attractiveness of vocational programs, and provide further training for study and career counselors. The aim is to encourage more young people to choose vocational training, as there is currently a significant labor shortage in these fields. The City Executive Board suggests responding to the motion, as the city is already actively working to strengthen vocational programs, for example by placing a sales and service program at Bromma Gymnasium.

Council members Jan Jönsson and Anne-Lie Elfvén (both L) proposed Stockholm establish a research hub to more closely link social services with research, advocating for co-location of social workers and researchers and clearer evaluation of social interventions. However, several committees and Stockholm University acknowledge the importance of research but believe the city's existing, more flexible collaborations with academia are effective and should be further developed instead of creating a new hub.

A motion proposed that Stockholm municipal employees should be able to take leave of absence to become foster parents, with the city continuously promoting this to address the shortage of foster homes and provide a more secure environment for children in care. However, the City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion, citing existing options for unpaid leave and concerns from the City Management Office regarding the increased costs and impact on welfare staffing if such leave were paid.

Jonas Naddebo and Svante Linusson (both C) have proposed that Stockholm investigate becoming a pilot city for self-driving cars in collaboration with Waymo, aiming to gain knowledge on their safety, climate benefits, and potential to reduce congestion in the city. However, the City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion, stating that the city is already monitoring developments through existing networks and research projects and prefers to await further investigations from relevant authorities.

Liberal Party members propose that the City Council instruct the city's committees and boards to prioritize the renovation and maintenance of Stockholm's culturally historical buildings, investigate budget adjustments for this, and explore creating a cultural heritage fund, to protect associations from evictions or sharp rent increases due to renovations. Referral bodies have mixed opinions, but the City Executive Board suggests responding to the motion by referring to ongoing investigations into new rental models and the Real Estate Committee's responsibility for preserving culturally historical buildings.

Liberal Party members propose Stockholm City take stronger action to protect privately owned, culturally significant buildings, including investigating new strategies and tools and strengthening options for compulsory management in cases of neglect. Several committees are open to reviewing the city's work with cultural environments but emphasize the complexity of the issue and that the municipality's options are limited by current legislation.

Hanna Wistrand (L) proposes that Stockholm investigate the possibility of constructing a year-round multi-track for skiing, cycling, and para-sports, creating an organized training environment for children, youth, and people with disabilities, and meeting demand from Vasaloppet trainers. The City Executive Office and Sports Committee are positive about the proposal and are already in discussions with the Stockholm Ski Association, but note challenges with land availability and the need to involve more sports federations.

Hanna Wistrand (L) proposed that the Sports Committee investigate restart support for sports clubs affected by facility closures during renovations, and also develop a long-term plan to increase facility access, for instance through subsidies or temporary structures. Reporting City Commissioner Jan Valeskog advised against the motion, citing existing support and plans, and the difficulty of fair distribution for such aid.

Council members Jan Jönsson and Sara Svanström (L) propose a SEK 10 million investment to enhance traffic safety around Stockholm's schools through safer crossings, improved lighting, expanded pedestrian/cycling paths, and clearer speed limits. The City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion due to ongoing work, a stance the Liberals deem insufficient given that current measures only cover 7-10 of the city's approximately 270 primary schools annually.

Kristin Jacobsson and Claes Nyberg (C) proposed that the City of Stockholm investigate freeze-drying leftover food from public operations and start a pilot project in schools to reduce food waste and strengthen crisis preparedness with municipal emergency stores. However, the City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion, stating the city already actively works to reduce food waste and build emergency reserves, and a freeze-drying pilot project would require costly equipment investments.

Council members Jan Jönsson and Sara Svanström (L) propose that the city invest more in improving accessibility and navigability in the urban environment for all residents, particularly those with disabilities, citing issues like building waste bags on sidewalks and inadequate snow removal. The City Executive Board suggests responding that the city is already addressing these concerns through initiatives like a pilot project against building waste bags and improved snow removal, though current legislation limits further action.

Mikael Valier Furtenbach (KD) proposed that Stockholm introduce special architectural zones in the city center and older districts to regulate the height, volume, materials, and design of new buildings for better harmony with existing older structures. The City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion, asserting that current steering documents and legislation already suffice to protect the city's character and cultural environment, and that the city must be able to develop with consideration for architecture from all periods.

Kristin Jacobsson (C) proposed that Stockholm should adhere to the Council of Europe's anti-trafficking convention, which grants potential victims at least 30 days' reflection period with a residence permit and a package of rights. The motion highlighted the low number of applications from social welfare committees despite widespread exploitation of women in prostitution. The City Executive Board suggests responding to the motion by stating that the city is already actively addressing these issues and that its program against violence and human trafficking is being revised to include the matter.

Council members Jan Jönsson and Anne-Lie Elfvén (L) proposed that Stockholm City investigate the living conditions and health of elderly LGBTQI+ individuals in elder care, also calling for LGBTQI+ competence requirements in elder care procurements and continuous staff training on respectful treatment, equal opportunities, and LGBTQI+ issues. However, the City Executive Board suggests that the motion be addressed by referring to ongoing work on the city's action plan for LGBTQI+ persons' equal rights and opportunities.

Councilors Ismail Ali and Claes Nyberg (C) proposed that the Preschool Committee develop a plan for all preschools in Stockholm to conduct cultivation as part of their pedagogical activities, aiming to strengthen children's understanding of nature and sustainable development. The City Executive Board suggests that the motion be answered by referring to current municipal efforts and steering documents, such as new play value guidelines and the Sustainable Preschool project, which already promote cultivation and green environments in preschools, deeming further city-wide direction unnecessary.

Claes Nyberg (C) proposed that Stockholm City introduce sibling priority for preschool placements where an older sibling attends a primary school organizationally or geographically linked to the preschool, aiming to ease family life and promote equality. The City Executive Board recommends rejecting the motion, citing that the proposal requires extensive investigations, is not justified given existing school choice, and that such organizational links are currently absent.

Rasmus Jonlund et al. from the Liberal Party proposed a motion for the city to begin planning a Stockholm Exhibition in 2030, seeking collaborations for its realization. This exhibition would mark the centenary of the 1930 Stockholm Exhibition, focusing on future architecture, design, and urban planning. As the City Executive Office and Stockholm Business Region AB are already investigating the prerequisites for such an exhibition, the Municipal Board suggests responding to the motion by referring to this ongoing work.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposed that the municipality investigate merging its three housing companies, Familjebostäder, Svenska Bostäder, and Stockholmshem, to improve cost, climate, and energy efficiency and increase housing availability. However, the City Executive Board recommends dismissing the motion without an investigation, believing the companies are already addressing these areas and that a merger could complicate governance and leadership, as well as raise competition law issues.