City-wide

The motion proposes that Stockholm introduce a building permit robot and investigate which other simple permits, such as permits for outdoor dining areas and use of public spaces, could be automated. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the city is already developing new digital systems and automated processes; a new integrated system for traffic permits is planned for implementation in 2026.

The motion by Björn Ljung and André Nilsson (L) proposes that detailed development plan fees be divided and paid at different milestones, particularly to help smaller developers manage cash flow and make housing construction more stable during an economic downturn. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the city already invoices continuously throughout the planning process and considers planning fees to make up only a small part of developers’ costs.

A motion proposes that SISAB, Stockholm’s school property company, should cover the costs of replacing schools’ access-control systems, so that security does not depend on each school’s finances. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, as the issue is already being examined in the ongoing review of the agreement between SISAB and the Education Committee; other costs, such as ventilation and minor construction measures, are not generally proposed to be shifted from the schools.

Jan Jönsson (L) proposes that the City of Stockholm survey all schoolyards and renovate them so that students, parents and staff with different abilities can use them. The Education Committee is positive but emphasizes that assessing around 140–150 schoolyards requires resources, and the City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered addressed with reference to the city’s ongoing work; since 2015, around five schoolyards per year have been rebuilt, and 13 have been renovated during the current term.

The motion proposes that Stockholm establish a research hub where social workers and researchers work more closely together, and that social interventions be evaluated more clearly and linked more closely to research. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the city already collaborates with universities and wants to develop more flexible forms of research, evaluation, and evidence-based work in social services.

The motion proposes giving Stockholm City employees the opportunity to take leave from their jobs to become foster families, with the city regularly informing them about this option. The proposal is being considered against the shortage of foster families; the City Executive Office and several committees also point to costs and risks to staffing, while the city is already planning expanded recruitment and support for foster families.

Jonas Naddebo and Svante Linusson (Centre Party) propose that Stockholm investigate a small-scale pilot project with self-driving vehicles in cooperation with Waymo. The project would examine safety, climate benefits and congestion, but the City Executive Board proposes that the motion be answered by referring to the city’s ongoing research, networks and discussions; several referral bodies also want to await more knowledge and the authorities’ investigations.

Hanna Wistrand (L) proposes that the city investigate restart support for sports clubs affected when facilities are closed for renovations, and develop a long-term plan for more sports grounds and temporary premises. The City Executive Office and the Sports Committee refer to existing rent support, compensation times, and relocation solutions, and the City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered rather than result in new assignments.

The motion from Jan Jönsson and Sara Svanström (Liberals) proposes the “Safe School Routes” initiative to make children’s journeys to and from Stockholm’s schools safer year-round. The proposals include safer pedestrian crossings, improved lighting, more walking and cycling paths, lower speed limits, and better snow removal, with SEK 10 million in additional funding; the City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, as the city is already implementing similar measures, including at 7–10 of approximately 270 compulsory schools each year.

The motion proposes that the City investigate whether surplus food from schools, care homes and other facilities could be freeze-dried, test the method in selected schools, and establish a municipal stockpile of freeze-dried food for emergencies. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the City is already working to reduce food waste and is building up local and central emergency stockpiles; the Education Committee also considers that a pilot project would require costly specialist equipment.

Jan Jönsson and Sara Svanström propose targeted measures to ensure that everyone can move around Stockholm safely and independently, whether walking, cycling, using a wheelchair or pushing a pram. The motion highlights, among other things, construction bags blocking pavements and pedestrian crossings, as well as inadequate snow clearance and de-icing; the City Executive Board instead proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the city is already addressing these issues, including through a pilot project in which 597 construction bags were marked and 554 removed, as well as expanded gritting and salting.

Mikael Valier Furtenbach (KD) proposes that Stockholm introduce a special architecture zone in the city centre and older stone-built suburbs, for example within the toll boundaries, to guide the height, volume, materials and design of new buildings so they fit better into historic environments. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the city already has laws, the comprehensive plan, building regulations and an architecture policy intended to protect the cultural environment; several referral bodies also stress that both older and more recent architecture need to be safeguarded as the city develops.

The motion proposes that Stockholm ensure potential victims of human trafficking receive at least 30 days to consider their situation, with a temporary residence permit and prompt access to safe housing, legal advice, healthcare, psychological support, an interpreter, and financial assistance. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, as the city is already working on the issue and revising its anti-trafficking programme, while several referral bodies are calling for clearer guidelines and greater support.

The motioners Jan Jönsson and Anne-Lie Elfvén (Liberal Party) propose that Stockholm investigate the living conditions and health of older LGBTQI people and require LGBTQI competence in the procurement of eldercare services. They also call for ongoing training for staff in home care and residential care homes. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the city is already working on inclusive treatment, training, and requirements for providers, including through the proposed action plan for equal rights and opportunities for LGBTQI people to 2030.

The motion proposes that all preschools in Stockholm should have better opportunities to grow plants as part of their teaching, including through cooperation with allotment associations, housing cooperatives, and parks. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, as the city is already working on greener preschool yards, new guidelines for play value, and the Sustainable Preschool project, while allowing preschools to adapt their activities to local conditions.

Claes Nyberg (C) proposes that children should receive sibling priority for preschool if a sibling already attends an organizationally or geographically linked compulsory school. The proposal aims to make drop-offs and pick-ups easier for families, but the City Executive Board recommends responding to the motion without implementing it, as it would require extensive investigations, new digital systems, and changes to the rules.

The City Council will consider a proposal to plan a new Stockholm Exhibition in 2030, one hundred years after the 1930 exhibition. It is intended to bring the city, businesses, the cultural sector, researchers and civil society together around architecture, design, sustainable construction and Stockholm’s future; Stockholm Business Region, together with several city offices, has already begun investigating the planning and potential collaborations.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposes investigating a possible merger of Stockholm’s three municipal housing companies—AB Familjebostäder, AB Svenska Bostäder and AB Stockholmshem. The aim is to reduce costs, make construction and management more efficient, strengthen climate efforts and create more affordable housing; however, the City Executive Board proposes that no separate investigation is needed because the companies already cooperate.

Hanna Wistrand (L) proposes that the city investigate whether Swedish for Immigrants (SFI) can be used to inform newly arrived adults about swimming lessons and help them contact swimming schools. The proposal also covers how sports associations could participate; several committees are positive, but there are legal and practical obstacles, including limited association capacity and requirements for a personal identity number and BankID.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposes expanding Hammarbybacken with a new summit and raising the existing summit using excavated material from the subway expansion. This could provide more ski slopes and better opportunities for activities including cycling and summer skiing, but the Exploitation Office considers the material necessary for other projects, and the City Planning Office warns of impacts on the natural values of Nackareservatet; the City Executive Board therefore proposes that the motion be considered answered without assigning any new tasks.