All agenda items

Liberal politician Jan Jönsson proposed naming a public space in Stockholm after Aaron Isaac, the first Jew permitted to settle in Sweden without converting to Christianity in 1775, to highlight Jewish history and contributions, especially as it marks 250 years since Jewish life was established in Sweden. However, the City Executive Board rejected the proposal, citing existing places connected to Isaac (such as Aaron Isaacs gränd and a Jewish cemetery) and concerns about potential confusion from a new name. They instead suggested enhancing information about the current sites, for example, with signage.

Jan Jönsson (L) proposed that the City of Stockholm investigate the prevalence of Afrophobia in city schools, including by analyzing reports of discrimination and hate crimes. The city responded that a broader mapping of all forms of racism in schools is already underway in 2025, and Afrophobia is part of that effort. They believe the results of this broader survey should be awaited before deciding on additional specific investigations.

Councillor Jan Jönsson (L) proposed a new survey on antisemitism in Stockholm's schools and preschools, citing an increase since the last one in 2021, with the goal of developing a new action plan. However, the City Executive Board stated that the city is already actively working against antisemitism and prefers to await the completion of current national and local investigations in 2025 before conducting new surveys.

Councilor Jan Jönsson (L) proposed introducing a Swedish language test, similar to the existing math test, for students entering upper secondary school to better assess reading comprehension and provide feedback to compulsory schools. However, the City Executive Office, the Education Committee, and City Commissioner Emilia Bjuggren (S) rejected the proposal, citing concerns about its scope, design challenges for comparable results with 9th-grade grades, and insufficient benefits to justify the cost, referencing a previous 2022 inquiry. Moderaterna and Liberalerna reserved against the decision, arguing the test is crucial for early detection and remediation of reading comprehension deficiencies.

The Centre Party proposes that Stockholm comprehensively address the city's avenues and older trees by inventorying them, developing a strategy for their protection and development, identifying new locations for avenues, and transforming Karlbergsvägen into a green esplanade. The City Executive Board responds that much of this is already covered by the city's ongoing work with a new tree policy, new tree care guidelines, and an upcoming tree database, and that planting trees on Karlbergsvägen is difficult due to underground infrastructure.

Jan Jönsson (L) proposes that the City of Stockholm map the prevalence of homo- and transphobia across all its operations to counter discrimination. Most committees believe the city already addresses these issues through its human rights program and an action plan for LGBTQI+ rights. However, Jönsson and other critics argue that the focus should shift more towards users' experiences and that more operations should become LGBTQ-certified.

Jan Jönsson and Anne-Lie Elfvén (both L) proposed measures to simplify and improve conditions for Stockholm's tourism industry, suggesting reduced bureaucracy, better service, and clearer rules for restaurants, hotels, and nightlife, including shorter processing times and a review of outdoor seating and dance permits. While municipal offices believe these issues are already being addressed, Svensk Handel and Visita Stockholm support the proposal.

A motion by Jonas Naddebo (C) proposed that the City Executive Board take coordinated responsibility for developing Fagersjöviken in Magelungen into an attractive area for water recreation, including measures to improve swimming, paddling, and fishing. However, the City Executive Board, led by Karin Wanngård, believes the city is already addressing this through existing programs and collaborations, balancing recreational opportunities with biodiversity protection. Some opposition parties dissented, arguing for clearer leadership and specific actions for Fagersjöviken beyond general initiatives for Magelungen.

The Liberals propose an evaluation of current environmental zones, including those in Gamla stan and Södermalm, to assess their impact on air quality, emissions, residents, and businesses, aiming for future decision-making. The City Executive Board responds that evaluations are already underway or planned, emphasizing the importance of environmental zones for improving air quality and achieving climate targets.

The Liberals propose that Stockholm City map the use of digital tools in preschools and develop clear guidelines to ensure preschools are largely screen-free, especially for younger children, prioritizing their development through play and interaction. However, city management and several district councils believe the recently revised preschool curriculum already addresses these issues by stipulating that analog tools should be the norm for the youngest children and digital tools used restrictively with a clear educational purpose.

The Liberals propose Stockholm map honor-based oppression in city preschools to better combat it and support staff, stating the extent of the issue is unknown but a serious violation of children's rights. The municipal executive board majority wants to await a national inquiry on the topic while emphasizing the city will continue its work against honor-related violence and oppression.

Destiny Zandi Lindgren (KD) proposed that Stockholm aim to maintain at least the 2020 level of parking spaces, arguing that parking is crucial for residents and that more underground garages could improve the city. However, several municipal committees and companies, including the traffic and development committees, oppose this, stating it would conflict with current city plans to reduce car traffic, improve accessibility, lessen climate impact, and free up valuable space; consequently, the City Executive Board recommends rejecting the motion.

Council member Johan Nilsson (M) proposed that the City of Stockholm acquire land in Långbro Park to protect its natural and cultural values. This concerns the property Lågbron 1, where a private owner plans to build twelve townhouses and a café; Nilsson believes the land should become part of the park and the housing built elsewhere. The City Executive Board recommends that the motion be addressed by allowing the ongoing detailed development plan process to continue, ensuring public and committee member input before any decision on new construction in Långbro Park.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposed redeveloping Johanneshovsvägen into a green boulevard with fewer lanes, wider pedestrian and bicycle paths, and approximately 1045 new homes, aiming to create new meeting places and a greener urban environment. The City Executive Board believes these proposals are already covered by the ongoing Årstastråket project and thus no new mandates are needed, a stance the Center Party disputes, arguing their motion extends beyond the current project.

The Liberals have proposed revising the city's land allocation policy to better support social housing initiatives, seeking clearer social requirements regarding housing types and target groups, and a larger role for the Social Services Committee. However, the City Executive Office, the Exploitation Committee, and Stockholm City Hall AB believe these intentions are already addressed in ongoing work on new land allocation guidelines and a housing provision action plan, arguing that social requirements have already been strengthened and the Social Services Committee's expertise is considered. The Liberals disagree, contending that the policy lacks concrete, binding requirements to effectively tackle structural homelessness and housing accessibility for low-income individuals.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposed developing Kista into a Nordic total defense center to reverse the negative trend of businesses leaving and to increase safety, by attracting defense industry in collaboration with the government. The City Executive Board responded that the city is already working to make Kista more attractive through housing, urban development, and attracting new businesses, including those in defense and security, but a specific defense center isn't necessarily the solution.

Gabriel Kroon (SD) proposed allowing residents to purchase trees to be planted on public land in Stockholm, complete with a name plaque. The idea aimed to find new funding for trees without burdening the city's budget, as planting is expensive. The City Executive Board and most committees rejected the proposal, deeming it too administratively complex and costly for the city due to issues like tree and site selection, and noting that substantial tree-planting initiatives are already underway.

Gabriel Kroon and Tapani Juntunen (SD) have proposed that all public signage in Stockholm, including advertising, should primarily be in Swedish, with Swedish text dominating even if other languages are used. The City Executive Office and the Traffic Committee advise against this, stating it lacks constitutional support and could hinder communication and inclusion for tourists and new arrivals. While the proposal suggests the Traffic Committee investigate implementation, the city's current policy is to always use Swedish, with translations provided when necessary.

Two Liberal members proposed that city development guidelines, like the architecture policy and small house area strategy, be more strictly followed by all committees. They advocated for better coordination and regular follow-ups to preserve Stockholm's character and prevent conflicts in construction projects. The City Executive Board responded that work is already underway to strengthen these documents and inter-committee coordination, but the Liberals argue this isn't enough to protect valuable areas from exploitation.

Åsa Nilsson Söderström (L) proposed Stockholm establish a competency center to assist residents facing transnational repression—threats and pressure from their home countries—by providing knowledge, advice, and legal support. While the city and district councils recognize the issue's importance, they believe this responsibility lies with state authorities, though they are open to dialogue. Liberals contend such a center could be organized municipally, drawing parallels to existing programs like Origo, which addresses honor-related violence.