All agenda items

Council members Jan Jönsson and Björn Ljung (Liberals) propose that Stockholm develop a strategy to increase allotments and urban farming areas, streamlining the process for establishing new lots and identifying suitable land. While several committees and administrations acknowledge the growing interest in urban farming and note that a program is already underway, the Liberals argue that progress is too slow and more innovative solutions are needed to meet the high demand.

Moderates proposed the immediate establishment of a new recycling center in western Söderort, following the closure of the Sätra facility, urging increased capacity at existing centers and an urgent replacement for the closed plant. The Executive Board and relevant City Commissioner recommend dismissing the motion, as Stockholm Vatten och Avfall AB is already addressing the issue: a temporary mini-recycling center will open in Skärholmen in September 2025, Vantör's capacity has increased, and work on a permanent full-scale center in western Söderort is ongoing.

Nike Örbrink (KD) proposed establishing a waste ombudsman in Stockholm to review the city's finances and spending over two years, aiming to streamline expenditures outside core tasks. However, the red-green majority and the City Executive Board believe existing control systems, like the City Audit and the city's governance model, are sufficient and suggest dismissing the motion by referring to these functions.

A motion by Jan Jönsson and Björn Ljung (both L) proposes that Stockholm actively support new, innovative housing models, like the Kymmendö model, focusing on social and economic sustainability. They also suggest investigating and removing regulatory obstacles and adapting land policy to prioritize projects that foster a more inclusive housing market. The City Executive Board proposes the motion be answered by noting that the city already undertakes similar initiatives and that current governance provides for this type of development.

Destiny Zandi Lindgren (KD) has proposed that Stockholm investigate using lighter colors for asphalt and sidewalks to make the city more attractive, combat high temperatures during heatwaves, and save energy on lighting. However, several city departments, including the City Management Office and the Traffic Committee, are hesitant about colored asphalt as a general solution for the entire city, citing costs, traffic safety concerns for the visually impaired, and the belief that increased greenery is a more effective climate adaptation measure. The City Executive Board therefore proposes rejecting the motion, referring to existing climate adaptation work and the prioritization of more green spaces.

Council members Dennis Wedin and Henrik Virro (both M) propose that the City Executive Board investigate and develop a city-wide Facility Management (FM) strategy to streamline building and premises administration, aiming to reduce costs, improve working environments, and enhance service quality. While the City Management Office and Property Committee acknowledge the need for efficiency, they argue that work is already underway within existing purchasing categories and fear an overly standardized strategy could reduce flexibility.

Councilors Annika Elmlund and Johan Nilsson (M) proposed making Stockholm greener and more enjoyable by developing a plan to transform underutilized spaces like flat roofs, areas under bridges, new quays, and facades into green oases and mini-parks. However, the City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion, citing ongoing similar work within city administrations and companies, though several committees and even the Moderates have filed reservations, wishing to approve the motion and develop a specific action plan.

Moderates Annika Elmlund and Johan Nilsson proposed a plan for Stockholm to build more townhouses and similar residences, citing a need for larger homes, especially for families, and greater housing diversity. However, the City Executive Board, led by Mayor Karin Wanngård, recommended rejecting the proposal, stating the city already addresses these issues within existing plans and budgets, though they agree on the need for structured efforts to enable more townhouses.

Tom Hedrup (M) has submitted a motion proposing that all high school students in Stockholm should visit a university at least once before graduation, aiming to boost interest in higher education, especially among students from families with no prior university experience. The City Executive Board suggests rejecting the motion, stating that city high schools already collaborate with institutions like KTH and Stockholm University, including through Vetenskapens Hus, to offer visits and foster interest.

The Education Committee approved the Education Administration's response to an inquiry from Jan Jönsson (L) regarding expanded holiday schools and support groups for "grey zone children," who are at risk of not meeting learning objectives but don't qualify for extensive support. The committee was informed that Stockholm's municipal schools already offer holiday school and extra study time for at-risk students, but the administration's mandate does not include independent schools. Vice-Chair Andréa Hedin (M) and Jan Jönsson (L) dissented, proposing that an action plan for "grey zone children" be developed.

The Education Committee decided to forward a letter from the Liberals and Moderates concerning school coordinators and the transition to high school for placed children to the Education Administration for further preparation. This means the administration will now investigate the proposals further.

The Education Committee approved the Education Administration's response regarding school social teams, stating that a pilot project for these teams is underway in five primary school districts to boost safety and study environments. However, the administration doesn't plan to introduce them in high schools due to organizational challenges. The Moderates, Liberals, and Centre Party issued a special statement advocating for the expansion of these teams to all schools, long-term funding, and an investigation into school social support for high school students as well.

The Education Committee approved the Education Administration's response to a letter from Jan Jönsson (L) regarding strengthening students' ability to cope with demands and setbacks. The Administration stated that city schools already actively address this based on local needs, as part of their systematic quality work. However, Jan Jönsson (L) expressed in a separate statement that the response was unsatisfactory and that more systematic and equitable work is needed.

Stockholm's Education Committee approved the Education Administration's statement regarding a motion by Andréa Hedin (M) on protecting students in special schools from violence. The Administration deemed a separate survey on honor-based violence, sexual violence, and criminal recruitment unnecessary due to existing national studies, and a new safety program redundant as current support materials cover all school types. However, they were positive about continuing to increase staff knowledge, but without additional mandatory training. Andréa Hedin (M) and Jan Jönsson (L) reserved their positions, advocating for the motion's proposals of a survey, a specific safety program, and mandatory staff training.

The Education Committee approved the Education Administration's statement in response to a motion from the Sweden Democrats, which proposed that meat, poultry, or fish always be an option at public meals, including in schools. The Committee rejected the motion, stating that each school determines its own meals based on local conditions and existing regulations, and there are no grounds to mandate schools always offer meat, poultry, or fish. Mats Johnsson (SD) registered a reservation against the decision.

The Education Committee approved the Education Administration's statement regarding a motion to make Stockholm's art collection more accessible, particularly for schools. The administration was positive about digitizing art, involving students in creating educational material, placing more art in schools, and reviewing the rental model. However, the Vice-Chairperson Andréa Hedin (M) and Jan Jönsson (L) dissented, arguing the motion should have been fully adopted to ensure the work's prioritization and implementation.

The Education Committee approved the Education Administration's report to the Swedish Schools Inspectorate, following a quality review of Stockholm's upper secondary schools. While the city partially ensures education is based on scientific grounds and proven experience, further development is needed to systematically monitor this and share best practices. A collaboration with Stockholm University has been initiated for school leaders to strengthen their ability to lead educational development.

The Education Committee approved Bredängsskolan's registration to compete in the "School" category for Stockholm City's Quality Award 2026. This award aims to recognize and reward operations that successfully foster quality development and sustainability for the benefit of Stockholm's residents. The decision was immediately adjusted due to the registration timeline.

The Education Committee approved and forwarded the Education Administration's positive opinion on Stockholm City's revised cultural strategy program to the City Executive Board. The opinion supported the program's aim to strengthen culture's role and accessibility but emphasized the need to clarify the school's role in children's and young people's cultural encounters, as well as the relationship between this new program and the existing "Children's Right to Culture" program. Vice Chairman Andréa Hedin (M) and Mats Johnsson (SD) dissented, offering their own proposals.

The Education Committee partially approved the administration's proposal to expand mobile nature school activities with a new unit, specifically for southwestern Stockholm, allowing more students to experience nature locally. The committee also decided the administration should continue searching for suitable, vacant premises to establish a permanent nature school in the area in the future. Several parties dissented, arguing that a permanent nature school was not a responsible priority given the current economic climate.