All agenda items

The motion proposes revoking the land allocation for housing at Solviksängen along Alviksvägen and instead including areas 25 and 44 in the Ålstensskogen and Storskogen nature reserve. The City Executive Office, the Real Estate Committee, and the City Planning Committee propose that the motion be considered answered, as the site could be assessed for approximately 50 rental homes and issues concerning nature, recreation, and the local environment will be investigated in the detailed development plan; the proposer instead wants to concentrate housing construction in Bromma on already developed areas such as Alviks strand, Brommadepån, and Linta Gårdsväg.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposes that all football pitches in Stockholm should have access to toilets, and that larger facilities should also have changing rooms. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the city is already working to build more toilets and changing rooms, including by using facilities in schools and sports halls where possible; the administrations also point to limitations related to land, detailed plans, and costs.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposes that the Sports Committee and the Property Committee expand cooperation with other municipalities on sports facilities, so that more children and young people have the opportunity to train. The proposal covers both ordinary facilities, such as football pitches, ice rinks and sports halls, and specialized facilities; the City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered because cooperation already exists, including on Sollentuna Athletics Hall, Botkyrka Shooting Center and the Drevviken natural ice rink.

Hanna Wistrand (L) proposes that Stockholm, together with other municipalities in Stockholm County, investigate how children and young people with disabilities can gain better access to regular leisure activities and how these services can be funded in the long term. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the city already cooperates through the Fritid för alla and Föreningen för Storstockholms kultur- och fritidschefer networks and is working on a regional model for parasports.

The motion proposes investigating whether the construction tunnels in the new Östberga Tunnel, Hammarbyskogen, and Finnboda could be converted into shelters or protected spaces after construction. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the Swedish Civil Defence Agency must first determine the need and technical requirements, and the state is responsible for decisions and funding.

Therese Lindström (M) proposes permanently opening a northbound lane for car traffic on Skanstullsbron, as the reconstruction of Skansbron has caused diversions, congestion, and longer travel times. However, the Traffic Committee and the City Executive Office consider that an extra lane would not solve the problem, since capacity is mainly limited by the intersection at Skanstull and the measure would require reducing space for pedestrians and cyclists; the City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered without any further assignment.

The motion proposes that the city investigate how Sergels torg and Soltorget could become a greener, safer and more welcoming gathering place called Sergelparken. The proposal includes more plantings, outdoor cafés and areas for people to stay, a possible conversion of the roundabout into a T-junction, and enclosing the area beneath the fountain; however, the City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, as work is already underway and major changes are considered technically, culturally and historically, and financially difficult.

The motion proposes more mobile tree plantings with seating on paved streets, squares, and other places where trees cannot be planted directly in the ground. It also proposes that the Traffic Committee develop common rules for placement, design, maintenance, and biosecurity; however, the City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, as the city is already carrying out similar measures, including through Levande Stockholm and a SEK 71 million tree investment in the 2026 budget.

Sergej Salnikov (SD) proposes stricter checks of student housing to prevent people from remaining after completing their studies or subletting without permission. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the municipal housing companies already check proof of study, work to prevent unauthorized subletting, and inform tenants; checks are carried out annually, twice a year by Familjebostäder and every term by Stockholmshem.

The motion proposes that the City of Stockholm establish long-term cooperation with associations and other nonprofit organizations offering homework help in socioeconomically disadvantaged and overcrowded areas, and lend out school and other premises in the evenings and on weekends. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since schools are already required to offer at least two hours of additional study time per week for students in grades 4–9 and many libraries provide homework help; the Homework Help Foundation, however, is supportive and states that it already assists 210 students at 14 Stockholm schools during the 2025/26 school year.

Jan Jönsson and André Nilsson (the Liberals) propose allowing more actors, including private companies, to build Stockholm Houses according to the same basic standards and conditions, in order to increase the pace of construction, reduce costs, and create more affordable rental housing. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the model has already been opened up through a dynamic purchasing system since 2021, increasing the number of qualified contractors from three to twelve.

Sara Svanström (L) proposes that Stockholm map dangerous pedestrian crossings, prioritize those needing action first, and implement measures such as better lighting, clearer markings, audible signals, and raised crossings. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the Traffic Committee is already working on similar measures and, under the 2026 budget, will map safety at the city’s crossings; around 330 locations have so far been rebuilt, and the work on the speed plans is expected to be completed in 2027.

Jan Jönsson and Sara Svanström (the Liberals) propose a digital map function that compiles up-to-date information on roadworks, closures, traffic restrictions and available loading zones to facilitate deliveries to Stockholm’s shops. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the city already uses trafiken.nu and open data, but suggests that existing solutions could be further developed.

Jan Jönsson (L) proposes that all city schools be equipped with individual shower stalls, as some students feel unsafe or fear being photographed in the showers and therefore avoid showering or fully participating in physical education. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the Education Administration is already reviewing safer, more privacy-protective solutions, with shower stalls as one possible option; immediate installation in all schools would require additional resources.

The Liberals propose that Stockholm develop a strategy to keep rents in assembly halls, association premises and civic centres as low as possible. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, as the city is already investigating a model in which the Cultural Affairs Committee could become the primary tenant and use association grants, while the city cannot control rents set by private property owners.

A motion proposes that the City of Stockholm identify a site for a long-range shooting range for hunters and sport shooters, while also strengthening preparedness. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, as such a range requires large areas, extensive safety distances and noise protection, while the city’s land is already needed for housing, nature and recreation; regional cooperation or an indoor facility may be more feasible.

A motion proposes that Carl Bonde’s Forest in Hässelby be exempted from development and protected as a municipal nature reserve. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, as the city believes that the ongoing planning along Lövstavägen can provide housing in areas with lower nature values while preserving the forest’s most important ecological connections; a nature conservation strategy and a new comprehensive plan will guide future protection.

The motion proposes that the City of Stockholm begin LGBTQ+ certification of home care services and cooperate with advocacy organizations so that older LGBTQ+ people receive safe and respectful treatment in their homes. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, as the city already provides training, certification, and an action plan for LGBTQI people’s rights, while also proposing to further develop this work.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposes that the city investigate water areas for floating football pitches, including at Söder Mälarstrand and Liljeholmskajen, to create more sports facilities without taking land from housing or parks. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the issue is already part of the city’s planning, but several referral bodies believe that water-based solutions could be a complement and that costs, safety, accessibility, environmental impact, and winter storage need to be investigated.

The Liberals propose that the city investigate the obstacles faced by associations and how rules, grants, bookings, and collaboration can be simplified, with the aim of making Stockholm home to Sweden’s best environment for associations. The City Executive Board proposes that the motion be considered answered, since the city is already working on these issues and will develop an association policy in 2026; at the same time, referral bodies point to the need for clearer information, simpler applications, and more long-term financial support.