All agenda items

The Liberals propose that Stockholm should restore and preserve culturally significant parks like Vasaparken and Humlegården, suggesting new installations such as benches and lighting should resemble originals, and small kiosks for food and culture be allowed to enliven the spaces. City administrations indicate they already work to preserve these parks' cultural-historical value and kiosks are possible, though Södermalm supports the motion.

The Liberals proposed that the City of Stockholm allow associations to manage smaller parks through user agreements, aiming to increase engagement and improve maintenance. The City Executive Board rejected the motion, stating that primary responsibility for park maintenance must remain with the city, despite valuing citizen engagement. While some city districts already have user agreements, these are for "extra" tasks beyond normal upkeep and do not include financial compensation for the associations.

The Liberals proposed an investigation into increasing workplaces in Söderort to alleviate commuting and congestion, given that many residents currently travel to other parts of the city for work. The city responded that it is already actively working to strengthen Söderort with more jobs, with relevant measures integrated into ongoing budget assignments and planning, though the Liberals believe more can be done to facilitate business establishment.

Councillor Dennis Wedin (M) believes Stockholm's business climate has deteriorated, with a decline in new businesses, and proposes the city do more to support start-ups, including returning new business support to Stockholm Business Region and creating a consolidated permit center. Rapporteur Councillor Karin Wanngård (S) disputes this, arguing that the city's new model, Entreprenör Stockholm, is more effective, focusing on green transition, social entrepreneurship, and shortage occupations while ensuring better control over public funds. The City Executive Board therefore proposes the motion be addressed by referring to ongoing work.

The Liberals proposed naming a public space in Stockholm after Aaron Isaac, the first Jew permitted to reside in Sweden without converting in 1775, to commemorate Jewish history and contributions, especially during the 250th anniversary of established Jewish life in Sweden. The City Executive Board rejected the proposal, citing existing locations linked to Isaac and concerns about confusion from further naming. Instead, they suggested improving information at existing sites like the Aronsberg cemetery on Kungsholmen.

Jan Jönsson (L) proposed that the City of Stockholm map Afrophobia in the city's schools, including analyzing reports of discrimination and hate crimes and engaging with civil society. The majority of the City Executive Board and several committees believe a broader mapping of all racism in schools is already underway and that they should await its results and utilize the Equality Ombudsman's national work. The Liberals entered a reservation, arguing that a specific mapping of Afrophobia is needed, as it targets a particularly vulnerable group.

The Liberal party's Jan Jönsson proposed a new survey of antisemitism in Stockholm's schools, preschools, and other educational activities, along with an action plan, due to a perceived increase in antisemitism after the October 2023 terrorist attack on Israel. However, the City Executive Board believes the city is already actively combatting antisemitism through a new action plan against racism and an ongoing broader survey of racism in schools. Therefore, they want to await the results of these efforts before considering a new specific survey on antisemitism.

Jan Jönsson (L) proposed that Stockholm introduce a Swedish language test, similar to the math test, to better monitor high school students' reading comprehension and support elementary schools. The City Executive Board rejected the proposal, citing a previous investigation that found such a test would be too expensive, difficult to design, and not useful enough to justify the cost. They argued that current follow-up methods are sufficient and that the focus should be on providing teachers with better conditions for instruction.

The Centre Party proposes that Stockholm inventory the city's avenues and older trees, develop a strategy for their care and development, and identify new areas for tree planting, including transforming Karlbergsvägen into a green esplanade. The city responds that it is already working on a new tree policy addressing many of these issues, such as increasing canopy cover and inventorying trees. However, completely redesigning Karlbergsvägen is limited by underground infrastructure, though replanting efforts are underway.

Jan Jönsson (L) proposed that the City of Stockholm map the prevalence of homophobia and transphobia within its own operations to better understand and combat discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals, with results informing future measures and annual follow-up. While most committees and administrations believe their existing human rights program and new LGBTQI+ action plan sufficiently address this and a separate mapping is unnecessary or difficult, Jönsson argues current efforts are insufficient, lack focus on residents' experiences, and advocates for more LGBTQ-certified operations.

Council members Jan Jönsson and Anne-Lie Elfvén (both L) proposed measures to reduce bureaucracy, speed up permit processes, and clarify rules for Stockholm's visitor industry, arguing its importance for the city's appeal and economy. The City Executive Board, led by Karin Wanngård, rejected the motion, stating the city already actively addresses these issues through existing initiatives, digitalization, and a functioning industry council. However, Jan Jönsson (L) registered a reservation, noting industry support for the motion highlights the need for further action.

Jonas Naddebo (Centre Party) proposed that the City Executive Board take coordinated responsibility for making Fagersjöviken in Magelungen more attractive for water recreation, citing its deterioration and lack of clear plans for improvement. The Board, however, recommended rejecting the motion, stating that the city already undertakes extensive and coordinated efforts to improve both water quality and recreational opportunities throughout Magelungen, including Fagersjöviken, and that no further directive is needed, while emphasizing the lake's ecological balance. Naddebo was not satisfied and dissented, arguing for more specific interventions in Fagersjöviken and the need for external funding.

Two Liberal politicians proposed evaluating Stockholm's environmental zones, particularly in Gamla stan and Södermalm, for their impact on air quality, emissions, residents, and businesses, and comparing them with measures in other cities. The City Executive Board responded that ongoing evaluations already show positive effects on air quality, though compliance needs improvement, and they plan to introduce a stricter environmental zone in the City area.

The Liberals propose an investigation into digital tools in Stockholm's preschools, aiming for clear guidelines and screen-free environments, except for older children with a pedagogical purpose, citing concerns about screen time's negative impact on development. The city responds that the new preschool curriculum, effective July 1, 2025, already removes digital tool requirements, emphasizes analog learning for younger children, and that the Swedish National Agency for Education is developing support materials. Therefore, the city leadership believes the motion's intentions are met and preschool teachers should retain professional discretion over learning tools.

The Liberals propose that the City of Stockholm map honor-based oppression in preschools to better implement measures and educate staff, citing a lack of knowledge about the problem's extent and unclear current guidelines. The municipal board's majority rejects an immediate mapping, preferring to await a government inquiry on honor-related violence in preschools and schools, due in 2026, though work against honor-based oppression will continue in the interim.

Destiny Zandi Lindgren (KD) proposed that Stockholm should aim to maintain at least the same number of parking spaces as in 2020, to support motorists and ensure parking availability keeps pace with city growth. However, several boards and companies, including the Traffic Committee, argued that this contradicts the city's current plan to reduce car traffic by 30% by 2030, improve accessibility, reduce climate impact, and create more appealing public spaces, noting the city already has strategic parking plans and new guidelines in place.

Johan Nilsson (M) motioned for the City of Stockholm to acquire or exchange land to preserve Långbro Park, as a private owner plans to build 12 townhouses and a café on a historically park-integrated property. The City Executive Board, however, believes the detailed planning for the townhouses should proceed and public consultation be held before any decision. While relevant committees deemed the development feasible and Stadshus AB supported housing, they noted that land acquisition was outside their current scope.

Jonas Naddebo (Centre Party) proposes transforming Johanneshovsvägen into a green boulevard with reduced speed limits and fewer lanes. This would free up space for approximately 1045 new homes, wider pedestrian and bicycle paths, and a new square at Lindes light rail station, aiming to create a greener and more vibrant area. The Centre Party's proposal aligns with the city's existing plans for Årstastråket but seeks a more extensive urban development than currently planned.

The Liberals propose changes to Stockholm's land allocation policy, aiming for clearer social requirements when assigning land to developers to build more affordable homes. They also want the Social Welfare Committee to play a larger role in housing for special needs groups. However, the City Executive Board believes current work on new land allocation guidelines and a housing supply action plan already addresses these intentions, and that social considerations are already factored into housing construction.

Jonas Naddebo (C) proposes developing Kista into a Nordic total defense center to reverse the negative trend of businesses leaving and to increase safety, urging the city to collaborate with the government and others to attract defense-related operations. The City Executive Board responds that the city is already working intensely to develop Kista into a more vibrant and attractive mixed-use area focused on technology and innovation, with defense-related areas already part of the strategy, deeming the motion addressed by ongoing work.